Robeco logo

Disclaimer Robeco Switzerland Ltd.

The information contained on these pages is solely for marketing purposes.

Access to the funds is restricted to (i) Qualified Investors within the meaning of art. 10 para. 3 et sequ. of the Swiss Federal Act on Collective Investment Schemes (“CISA”), (ii) Institutional Investors within the meaning of art. 4 para. 3 and 4 of the Financial Services Act (“FinSA”) domiciled Switzerland and (iii) Professional Clients in accordance with Annex II of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) domiciled in the European Union und European Economic Area with a license to distribute / promote financial instruments in such capacity or herewith requesting respective information on products and services in their capacity as Professional Clients.

The Funds are domiciled in Luxembourg and The Netherlands. ACOLIN Fund Services AG, postal address: Leutschenbachstrasse 50, CH-8050 Zürich, acts as the Swiss representative of the Fund(s). UBS Switzerland AG, Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zurich, postal address: Europastrasse 2, P.O. Box, CH-8152 Opfikon, acts as the Swiss paying agent.

The prospectus, the Key Investor Information Documents (KIIDs), the articles of association, the annual and semi-annual reports of the Fund(s) may be obtained, on simple request and free of charge, at the office of the Swiss representative ACOLIN Fund Services AG. The prospectuses are also available via the website https://www.robeco.com/ch.

Some funds about which information is shown on these pages may fall outside the scope of CISA and therefore do not (need to) have a license from or registration with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA).

Some funds about which information is shown on this website may not be available in your domicile country. Please check the registration status in your respective domicile country. To view the Robeco Switzerland Ltd. products that are registered/available in your country, please go to the respective Fund Selector, which can be found on this website and select your country of domicile.

Neither information nor any opinion expressed on this website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco Switzerland Ltd. product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports.

By clicking “I agree” you confirm that you/the company you represent falls under one of the above-mentioned categories of addressees and that you have read, understood and accept the terms of use for this website.

I Disagree

29-04-2022 · Insight

Quant chart: Meme stock frenzy confirms short-selling signal

After more than a year following the short squeeze in so-called meme stocks, the informational advantage of short-selling data resurfaces.

    Authors

  • Matthias Hanauer - Researcher

    Matthias Hanauer

    Researcher

It is well documented that short-selling information has predictive power for future stock returns that goes beyond established factors such as low-risk, momentum, quality and value.1 However, the risk of short selling (for example, in the form of a short squeeze) and high lending fees have cast doubt on the risk-adjusted net profitability of shorting individual stocks.

That said, short-selling information can also be used in long-only applications by either (i) investing in the least shorted stocks, (ii) underweighting the most shorted stocks, or (iii) discriminating between similarly attractive low-risk, momentum, quality or value stocks.

In January 2021, however, the Reddit-fueled retail trading frenzy in highly-shorted ‘meme stocks’ such as GameStop and AMC Entertainment Holdings2 called into question the validity of the informational advantage gained from short-selling data. So did these events of January 2021 constitute a short-term phenomenon, or did they mark the end of an investment signal that had been successful for a long time?

Figure 1 | Cumulative relative performance for stocks sorted on short-selling information

Figure 1 | Cumulative relative performance for stocks sorted on short-selling information

Source: Refinitiv, Markit, Robeco. The figure shows the cumulative returns of stock quintile portfolios based on a composite of short-selling information. The quintile portfolios are equal-weighted and the outperformance is measured against the equally-weighted universe. The investment universe consists of MSCI Developed Index constituents. Region and sector neutrality are applied by independently ranking stocks within each region/GICS level 1 industry (11 sectors) bucket. Developed market regions are North America, Europe, and the Pacific. The sample period is January 2020 to March 2022.

Get the latest insights

Subscribe to our newsletter for investment updates and expert analysis.

Don’t miss out

Figure 1 shows the cumulative outperformance of stocks sorted into five quintile portfolios based on a composite of short-selling signals. These signals include the shorting ratio, but also take into account several criteria such as demand, supply, fees and liquidity.

In January 2021, the most shorted stocks outperformed by about 3%. However, after that, they underperformed leading to a cumulative underperformance of about -10% over the sample period. By contrast, the least shorted stocks only marginally underperformed in January 2021, before rebounding and generating an outperformance of around 8% over the same period. These results, therefore, suggest that short-selling data still offers investors valuable information beyond common factors.

Footnotes

1See: Boehmer, E., Jones, C. M., and Zhang, X., April 2008, “Which shorts are informed?”, Journal of Finance; Engelberg, J. E., Reed, A. V., and Ringgenberg, M. C., August 2012, “How are shorts informed?: Short sellers, news, and information processing”, Journal of Financial Economics; and Engelberg, J. E., Evans, R. B., Leonard, G., Reed, A. V., and Ringgenberg, M. C., November 2020, “The Loan Fee Anomaly: A Short Seller's Best Ideas”, SSRN working paper.
2See: Lee, J., January 2021, “Short sellers crushed like never before as retail army charges”, Bloomberg.