Robeco logo

Disclaimer Robeco Switzerland Ltd.

The information contained on these pages is solely for marketing purposes.

Access to the funds is restricted to (i) Qualified Investors within the meaning of art. 10 para. 3 et sequ. of the Swiss Federal Act on Collective Investment Schemes (“CISA”), (ii) Institutional Investors within the meaning of art. 4 para. 3 and 4 of the Financial Services Act (“FinSA”) domiciled Switzerland and (iii) Professional Clients in accordance with Annex II of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) domiciled in the European Union und European Economic Area with a license to distribute / promote financial instruments in such capacity or herewith requesting respective information on products and services in their capacity as Professional Clients.

The Funds are domiciled in Luxembourg and The Netherlands. ACOLIN Fund Services AG, postal address: Leutschenbachstrasse 50, CH-8050 Zürich, acts as the Swiss representative of the Fund(s). UBS Switzerland AG, Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zurich, postal address: Europastrasse 2, P.O. Box, CH-8152 Opfikon, acts as the Swiss paying agent.

The prospectus, the Key Investor Information Documents (KIIDs), the articles of association, the annual and semi-annual reports of the Fund(s) may be obtained, on simple request and free of charge, at the office of the Swiss representative ACOLIN Fund Services AG. The prospectuses are also available via the website https://www.robeco.com/ch.

Some funds about which information is shown on these pages may fall outside the scope of CISA and therefore do not (need to) have a license from or registration with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA).

Some funds about which information is shown on this website may not be available in your domicile country. Please check the registration status in your respective domicile country. To view the Robeco Switzerland Ltd. products that are registered/available in your country, please go to the respective Fund Selector, which can be found on this website and select your country of domicile.

Neither information nor any opinion expressed on this website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco Switzerland Ltd. product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports.

By clicking “I agree” you confirm that you/the company you represent falls under one of the above-mentioned categories of addressees and that you have read, understood and accept the terms of use for this website.

I Disagree

26-11-2024 · Insight

Quant chart: Outsmarting the crowd during index changes

The rise of passive investing in recent decades has been driven in part by its high level of transparency. However, this transparency has its drawbacks, such as the hidden costs related to the ‘index effect’. Robeco’s quant strategies offer the flexibility not only to avoid these pitfalls but to take advantage of them.

    Authors

  • Vera Roersma - Researcher

    Vera Roersma

    Researcher

  • Matthias Hanauer - Researcher

    Matthias Hanauer

    Researcher

  • Dean Walsh - Portfolio Manager

    Dean Walsh

    Portfolio Manager

The index effect

Index changes – such as which companies will be added and removed – happen on a specified rebalance date and are announced by index providers in advance. Due to their requirement to closely track public indices, passive strategies are therefore vulnerable to index front-running, where active managers exploit the announced index changes in a way their passive counterparts cannot.

This leaves passive strategies to buy stocks at relative price peaks and sell at relative lows. The index effect describes this abnormal return pattern – where the stocks to be added to an index outperform in the days before the addition and underperform in the days after. A reverse pattern also holds for index deletions. These patterns have not only been documented for major indices such as the S&P 500, but also for factor indices.1

Quant Charts

Passive is predictable for investors and competitors alike

Passive strategies are tasked with minimizing the tracking error to their respective benchmarks and, as such, tend to incorporate index changes only on the effective date. Conversely, active investors are free to trade after the announcement, which typically happens weeks in advance, or even earlier based on predicted index changes (using index methodology), with the knowledge that passive investors are obliged to follow the index.

While the increase in passive investing would seem likely to amplify these patterns, others argue that these have in fact declined, with market participants either increasingly trading on anticipated changes or by creating arrangements where other institutions stand ready to provide liquidity to indexers. 2

Figure 1 | Outsmart the crowd: Abnormal return around index additions

Figure  1  |  Outsmart the crowd: Abnormal return around index additions

Source: Robeco, Refinitiv. The figure shows the average cumulative outperformance of additions to the MSCI World Index relative to the MSCI World Index around quarterly index rebalancing dates. t=0 is the rebalancing date at which we reset the cumulative performance to zero. The sample period is January 2001 to August 2024.

Quantifying the index effect

Figure 1 revisits the index effect for the MSCI World Index additions from 2001 to 2024, showing the relative performance of the additions in the 20 days prior to and proceeding the index rebalance. It is clear that incoming stocks to the index outperform by about 2% before inclusion (t=0). However, after these stocks are added to the index, the outperformance is largely reversed, meaning that portfolios that trade directly upon the rebalance date buy these stocks at the worst moment.

This creates a hidden cost for passive investors, as the effect is embedded in the index, meaning they don’t underperform the benchmark but still bear the return impact. As a result, many investors remain unaware of how these dynamics affect their returns.

While we see that the patterns are more pronounced during the first half of our sample from 2001 to 2012, we still observe the index effect in the second half.3

Robeco’s quant strategies, such as Enhanced Indexing or more active strategies, have the flexibility to avoid these hidden costs by considering these effects when trading for our clients. While our proprietary stock selection models and risk management are the engine behind these strategies, a focus on practical portfolio management, optimal trading, and accounting for hidden costs such as the index effect is part of our ethos that every basis point counts. This agility enables Robeco investors to outsmart the crowd.

Footnotes

1 Cf., Shleifer, A. (1986), Do demand curves for stocks slope down? The Journal of Finance, 41(3), 579-590, Huij, J., & Kyosev, G. (2016), Price Response to Factor Index Additions and Deletions, SSRN Working Paper No. 2846982 ,and Blitz, D., & Marchesini, T. (2019), The Capacity of Factor Strategies, Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(6), 30-38.
2 Greenwood, R. M., & Sammon, M. (2024), The Disappearing Index Effect, The Journal of Finance, forthcoming.
3 In unreported results, we find similar but opposed patterns for index deletions, i.e., stocks announced to be removed from the index underperform before the actual rebalance and outperform after the rebalance.

Discover the value of quant

Subscribe for cutting-edge quant strategies and insights.

Explore quant

Active Quant: finding alpha with confidence

Blending data-driven insights, risk control and quant expertise to pursue reliable returns.

Find out more