Robeco logo

Disclaimer Robeco Switzerland Ltd.

The information contained on these pages is solely for marketing purposes.

Access to the funds is restricted to (i) Qualified Investors within the meaning of art. 10 para. 3 et sequ. of the Swiss Federal Act on Collective Investment Schemes (“CISA”), (ii) Institutional Investors within the meaning of art. 4 para. 3 and 4 of the Financial Services Act (“FinSA”) domiciled Switzerland and (iii) Professional Clients in accordance with Annex II of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) domiciled in the European Union und European Economic Area with a license to distribute / promote financial instruments in such capacity or herewith requesting respective information on products and services in their capacity as Professional Clients.

The Funds are domiciled in Luxembourg and The Netherlands. ACOLIN Fund Services AG, postal address: Leutschenbachstrasse 50, CH-8050 Zürich, acts as the Swiss representative of the Fund(s). UBS Switzerland AG, Bahnhofstrasse 45, 8001 Zurich, postal address: Europastrasse 2, P.O. Box, CH-8152 Opfikon, acts as the Swiss paying agent.

The prospectus, the Key Investor Information Documents (KIIDs), the articles of association, the annual and semi-annual reports of the Fund(s) may be obtained, on simple request and free of charge, at the office of the Swiss representative ACOLIN Fund Services AG. The prospectuses are also available via the website https://www.robeco.com/ch.

Some funds about which information is shown on these pages may fall outside the scope of CISA and therefore do not (need to) have a license from or registration with the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA).

Some funds about which information is shown on this website may not be available in your domicile country. Please check the registration status in your respective domicile country. To view the Robeco Switzerland Ltd. products that are registered/available in your country, please go to the respective Fund Selector, which can be found on this website and select your country of domicile.

Neither information nor any opinion expressed on this website constitutes a solicitation, an offer or a recommendation to buy, sell or dispose of any investment, to engage in any other transaction or to provide any investment advice or service. An investment in a Robeco Switzerland Ltd. product should only be made after reading the related legal documents such as prospectuses, annual and semi-annual reports.

By clicking “I agree” you confirm that you/the company you represent falls under one of the above-mentioned categories of addressees and that you have read, understood and accept the terms of use for this website.

I Disagree

26-02-2025 · Insight

Decomposing equity returns: Earnings growth versus multiple expansion

Over the past decade, the stock market has been dominated by the US economy, led by big tech and driven by strong earnings growth and multiple expansion. Companies such as Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia have fueled this rally, pushing US equities to record weights in global indices and high valuations versus historical norms and other markets. Compared to US growth stocks, European equities, emerging markets (EM), value stocks, low-volatility stocks, and small-cap stocks appear relatively cheap. But do these alternatives present the same investment case?

Download the full paper here


Summary

  1. US equities led due to strong growth and valuation expansion

  2. Small-cap and low-volatility stocks had strong fundamentals but lacked market appreciation

  3. Emerging markets struggled with weak earnings, except for Taiwan and India

To explore this, we decompose equity returns into earnings growth and multiple expansion. This analysis highlights key differences behind underperformance. Small-cap and low volatility stocks delivered strong earnings growth but lagged due to stagnant valuations. EM equities, however, struggled due to weak earnings growth, despite rising valuations. Taiwan and India were exceptions, posting solid earnings growth, though not enough to offset poor performance from China, Korea, and EMEA.

Ultimately, small-cap and low volatility stocks suffer from a lack of investor appreciation, while EM equities need a turnaround in operating performance.

Figure 1 | Decomposition of annualized total returns 2015-2024

Figure 1 | Decomposition of annualized total returns 2015-2024

Source: MSCI, Robeco. This chart is for illustrative purposes only.

Key findings: What drove performance?

Our approach follows John Bogle’s return decomposition formula:
Return = Dividend Yield + Earnings Growth +/- Change in P/E Ratio

This framework helps distinguish between returns driven by fundamentals – dividends and earnings growth – and those influenced by valuation changes. We applied this method to MSCI country and style indices over a ten-year period (2015-2024) to analyze regional and style-based return drivers.

  • US equities outperformed
    The US market led global performance, benefiting from both the highest earnings growth and significant multiple expansion.

  • Europe & Japan: modest growth, little valuation expansion
    These regions saw lower earnings growth and little multiple expansion, leading to weaker total returns.

  • EM struggled, with some exceptions
    Despite rising valuations, EM equities suffered from weak or even negative earnings growth. Taiwan and India posted strong earnings, but underperformance in China, Korea, and EMEA weighed on the region. LatAm struggled due to multiple contraction.

  • Small-cap and low volatility stocks: strong earnings, but out of favor
    Small-cap stocks consistently delivered stronger earnings growth than large caps. Based purely on fundamental returns, European small caps led all indices. However, their stagnant valuations constrained total returns, particularly in the US. Similarly, low volatility stocks posted robust earnings growth but failed to see valuation increases.

  • Value vs. growth stocks: US growth stocks dominate
    US growth stocks outperformed, fueled by both earnings growth and multiple expansion. Even US value stocks beat growth stocks in Europe, Japan, and EM. In EM, both value and growth stocks suffered negative earnings growth, though EM growth stocks benefited more from multiple expansion, while EM value stocks gained from dividends.


Related funds

QI Emerging Markets Enhanced Index Equities D EUR

Select other related funds

performance ytd (28/02)
1.11%
Performance 3y (28/02)
6.29%
since inception (28/02)
5.89%
total size of fund (28/02)
802mln
morningstar (28/02)
View the fund
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The value of the investments may fluctuate. Annualized (for periods longer than one year). Performances are net of fees and based on transaction prices.

Is a turnaround in sight?

US growth stocks are still going strong. Although earnings growth dipped in 2019-2020 and valuations contracted in 2021-2022, both have since rebounded. However, EM equities have shown little sign of a sustained recovery, with earnings stuck in a cyclical but flat trend.

What does this mean for investors? History suggests that dividends and earnings growth are the main driver of long-term returns, with valuation multiples prone to mean-reverting. While US growth stocks may continue to lead, the healthy fundamentals of small-cap and low volatility stocks indicate potential future opportunities. Earnings in EM will also rebound at some point, and, if the US earnings cycle peaks, US stocks could face multiple contraction.

Rather than extrapolating past trends, investors should prepare for a shifting market environment. A well-diversified portfolio across regions, sectors, and asset classes remains essential for resilience, regardless of how the next decade unfolds.

Download the full paper here


Get the latest insights

Subscribe to our newsletter for investment updates and expert analysis.

Don’t miss out