25-01-2024 · Research

3D Investing: Jointly optimizing return, risk, and sustainability

While portfolio construction approaches have most often been considered two-dimensional (incorporating risk and return goals), investing has historically been a multi-dimensional endeavor, with sustainability the latest addition to multi-objective investing.

 Read the full paper here


    Authors

  • David Blitz - Chief Researcher

    David Blitz

    Chief Researcher

  • Mike Chen - Head of Next Gen Research

    Mike Chen

    Head of Next Gen Research

  • Harald Lohre - Head of Quant Equity Research

    Harald Lohre

    Head of Quant Equity Research

To this end, we introduce in our recent research paper a multi-objective investment framework which we deem ‘3D investing’. We demonstrate that such framework results in the ‘best possible’ solution when jointly considering more than two portfolio objectives.

The new paper by David Blitz, Mike Chen, Clint Howard and Harald Lohre demonstrates how traditional mean-variance portfolio optimization can be enhanced by adding sustainability as a third goal, using carbon footprint and SDG (see Figure 1 below) as examples. We find the 3D investment approach generally outperforms the traditional 2D model with sustainability constraints. Our historical simulations show that 3D investing yields higher sustainability metrics and expected returns than a constraint-only method. However, using constraints in sustainable investing still has merit. A combined strategy, blending a flexible sustainability constraint with integrating sustainability into the optimization process, offers a balance between return, risk, and sustainability goals. For aggressive sustainability aims, the 3D approach, which explicitly incorporates sustainability alongside alpha and risk, is ideal.

Figure 1: 3D vs 2D investing performance when targeting higher SDG scores

Figure 1: 3D vs 2D investing performance when targeting higher SDG scores

Source: Robeco. The graph shows that when targeting higher SDG scores above the benchmark, the 3D investing approach is superior to using a portfolio constraint from an after-cost return perspective. This is especially true when targeting more ambitious sustainability goals in lower tracking error quant portfolios .

Download the publication

Get the latest insights

Subscribe to our newsletter for investment updates and expert analysis.

Don’t miss out

Important information

The contents of this document have not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission ("SFC") in Hong Kong. If you are in any doubt about any of the contents of this document, you should obtain independent professional advice. This document has been distributed by Robeco Hong Kong Limited (‘Robeco’). Robeco is regulated by the SFC in Hong Kong. This document has been prepared on a confidential basis solely for the recipient and is for information purposes only. Any reproduction or distribution of this documentation, in whole or in part, or the disclosure of its contents, without the prior written consent of Robeco, is prohibited. By accepting this documentation, the recipient agrees to the foregoing This document is intended to provide the reader with information on Robeco’s specific capabilities, but does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell certain securities or investment products. Investment decisions should only be based on the relevant prospectus and on thorough financial, fiscal and legal advice. Please refer to the relevant offering documents for details including the risk factors before making any investment decisions. The contents of this document are based upon sources of information believed to be reliable. This document is not intended for distribution to or use by any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation. Investment Involves risks. Historical returns are provided for illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect Robeco’s expectations for the future. The value of your investments may fluctuate. Past performance is no indication of current or future performance.