Suppose we want to compare two very different bonds, where the spread durations are one year and 10 years, and the credit spreads are 500 bps and 50 bps, for bond A and bond B, respectively. Both have a DTS of 500 and therefore will have the same expected credit volatility.
Also read: Duration Times Spread: measuring credit riskDTS only predicts the credit risk of the bonds, not their default risk. In our example, investors clearly perceive bond A to be riskier, as its credit spread is the highest of the two bonds. To predict default risk, one could use credit ratings or distress risk measures, such as distance-to-default. Moreover, DTS does not say anything about interest rate risk, because it only predicts risk driven by credit spread fluctuations. To measure a bond’s exposure to changes in risk-free interest rates, an investor can simply use the interest rate duration.
The DTS concept has various advantages. First and foremost, DTS is a more accurate predictor of future volatility than methods previously used by investors. Second, DTS is very simple to calculate, which makes it easy for portfolio managers to use in their daily work. Third, changing market circumstances are reflected in the DTS: if credit spreads double from one day to the next, so does the risk estimate.
Why should one multiply duration and spread? Why not use another formula? One can easily prove that by using DTS as the risk measure, we assume that credit spreads move in a relative fashion rather than a parallel fashion. In our example, if the credit spread of bond A moves from 500 to 550 bps (i.e. a 10% increase), then the credit spread of bond B will move from 50 to 55 bps (also 10% increase), and not from 50 to 100 bps. Our empirical research shows that relative spread changes indeed reflect credit markets more accurately than parallel spread changes.
Patrick Houweling
Head of Quant Fixed Income
“
DTS was originally developed by Robeco researchers in 2003
DTS was originally developed by Robeco researchers in 2003. Shortly thereafter, we started using it to monitor the credit risk of all of Robeco’s credit portfolios. A joint project with Lehman Brothers led to the publication of the results in The Journal of Portfolio Management in 2007.1 DTS is now widely accepted among investors, and it has been implemented in leading risk management software, including MSCI RiskMetrics and Bloomberg Barclays POINT.
Footnote
1Ben Dor, A., Dynkin, L., Hyman, J., Houweling, P., Van Leeuwen, E., and Penninga, O., ‘DTSSM (Duration Times Spread)’, The Journal of Portfolio Management, 2007, vol. 33. no. 2, pp. 77-100
下載刊物
免責聲明
本文由荷宝海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。 本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。 本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况,荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。