How ESG integration improves decision-making in credit investing

Credit events such as defaults or bankruptcies can often be traced to issues that in retrospect might have seemed glaringly obvious. ESG-related infringements like poorly designed governance frameworks, environmentally damaging activity or weak health-and-safety standards will almost inevitably undermine a company’s financial performance.

By considering ESG factors in the investment decision-making process, the Robeco credit team gains a better and more complete picture of the fundamental credit quality of the companies in their investment universe, which in turn supports their ability to select quality assets for portfolios.

How it works

“The key focus of Robeco’s credit analysis is the cash-generating capacity of the issuer, the quality of cash flows, and the ability to repay debt,” says Taeke Wiersma, Robeco’s Head of Global Credits. Analysts evaluate five factors to reach a conclusion on this, which is expressed in the form of a fundamental score – referred to as an F-score. The issuer’s ESG profile is one of these five factors, alongside its business position, strategy, financial position, and corporate structure and covenants.

“We believe in the principle that using financially material ESG information leads to better-informed investment decisions,” he says.

The assessment of ESG factors and their implications for an issuer’s fundamental credit quality involves four elements: the impact of the product or service produced, the company’s governance system, how the business is positioned in terms of the key ESG criteria relevant to each sector, and its climate resilience and decarbonization strategy.

Clear, substantiated recommendations

The value of clearly defined methodologies such as the ESG integration framework is that they take the emotion out of the equation.

“It gives me peace of mind that, by using the methodology, I can make clear, substantiated recommendations that are consistent with the recommendations our team makes across the universe of companies we cover,” says Ihor Okhrimenko, Credit Analyst at Robeco who specializes in the utilities and infrastructure sectors. “This is especially helpful in clarifying thinking about topics or sectors where we as analysts might have strong personal opinions.”

He believes that it is particularly important to apply fundamental analysis when it comes to ESG, given that the data quality in this realm is not always as rigorous as it is for financial indicators. “As analysts we know the companies we cover well and know when a data point doesn’t make sense. So that's where we can add value to the proposition.”

Every company report produced by the credit analysts has an ESG integration section, including a climate score and an SDG score. The sustainable investing (SI) profiles produced by Robeco’s SI Research team are used as input for this, along with internal data tools and data from third-party ESG data providers.

“Our role in the process is to go deeper in the sustainability assessment and to help fixed income investors understand the risks,” says Gabriella Abderhalden, Analyst in the SI Research team, who specializes in consumer discretionary companies.

“We read the published ESG reports, which of course all sound great. But it’s a matter of figuring out if there are any pitfalls for investors. We have all these nice [ESG and sustainability] targets, but in some instances this is not founded on a solid strategy. They talk about recycling, but there's very little information on what they do in this area, and how they have improved over the last, say, three or five years. These are all elements of greenwashing. And that's what I'm trying to identify.”

ESG integration, step by step

The first pillar in the ESG integration framework involves looking at the impact of the products that a company sells, to determine whether these entail financially material risks for the business. This is based on our view that companies that produce unsustainable products and services could face additional and financially material risks, which in turn could pose risks for credit investors.

“Airlines or oil companies are examples of businesses that might be under pressure, because the environmental impact of their products and services could eventually lead to reduced sales, or because there is a risk that carbon taxes could dilute a company’s earnings,” Okhrimenko says.

The second pillar of the ESG framework considers corporate governance. “This is an especially important element since, if there's a corporate governance issue, it's almost always financially material,” he explains.

The third pillar evaluates key ESG risk factors, which differ by sector. Robeco’s SI Research team features prominently here, as they provide a materiality framework per sector, in each case reflecting elements critical to that industry.

For the automotive industry, Abderhalden highlights human capital management in the transition to electric vehicles as one of the relevant sector-specific themes that she investigates and communicates to the credit analyst, especially in light of the enormous shifts that the industry is undergoing. Most automotive manufacturers are currently ill-prepared to face union-related issues and concerns about what the energy transition implies for the labor force.

“The fact that car makers have to launch battery cars is a huge human capital risk, because the workforce is large and the question is: how do you reskill everyone?”

The issuer’s exposure to climate change and its readiness to mitigate the effects are the theme of the final pillar of the framework. Here, the credit analyst uses an issuer-specific climate score, generated in accordance with the methodology created by the specialists in the SI Center of Expertise. This score reflects an assessment of the company’s influence on climate.

Okhrimenko explains that, “unlike in the other three pillars, we here consider double materiality: not only the financial risks of climate for the company, but also the company’s impact on climate.” This pillar requires the analyst to draw a conclusion on the issuer’s carbon intensity as well as the credibility of the company’s decarbonization strategy.

Here, too, the automotive industry is an interesting example. Abderhalden describes how she applies the methodology to assess the merits of a carmaker’s spending plans to finance its transition to electric vehicle production. She runs the numbers to estimate what it would cost the company to set up production facilities for batteries and battery cars, and the implied capex requirement for the coming five years. This is then compared with what has been communicated to the market. “If their capex budget falls short of our estimates, I would regard it as a warning sign and would flag it as a risk in the SI research report. The relevant credit analyst and portfolio managers would then pick this up.”

The value of Robeco’s ESG integration framework needs to be seen in the context of the full spectrum of sustainability-related tools that the credit teams apply. As Okhrimenko puts it, “ESG integration is important, but I view it as being the very first – and basic – element of a sustainability toolkit. It considers only the financial risk faced by the bond issuer, and is not necessarily about making the world a better place. The critical aspect in our move towards a more sustainable future is to have a focus towards impact.”

In that regard, he says, Robeco has powerful tools including its work on decarbonization, its ESG bond selection framework and the Robeco SDG Framework.

This is an extract from a longer publication:

‘Four ways credit investors can contribute to a more sustainable future’

免責聲明

本文由荷宝海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况,荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。

相關主題