Inflation, rate cuts, and the comeback of bond diversification
Bonds have historically served as a diversifier against riskier asset classes such as equities and commodities. However, in 2022, this relationship broke down as both bonds and equities sold off substantially due to spiking inflation and subsequent rate hikes. Typically, as shown in the chart below, correlations between equities and bonds have historically been negative when inflation eases, allowing bonds to regain their diversification benefits. We’ve seen this dynamic return more recently. As central banks begin cutting rates and core inflation eases below 3%, the stock-bond correlations should move back to negative. And high-quality fixed income will once again assume its role as a portfolio diversifier.
At the start of August 2024, equities sold off due to weaker US labor market data and geopolitical risks, while high-quality fixed income investments, such as US government bonds and investment grade credit, delivered positive total returns as Treasury yields dropped.
Investment grade credit, with its duration exposure has a built-in diversifier. This means that although corporate spreads might widen in response to disappointing economic data or volatility, investment grade credit also benefits significantly from a drop in interest rates, which protects total returns.
Stock-bond correlation
![Stock-bond correlation](https://images.ctfassets.net/tl4x668xzide/4goz1ag3pHiSSY0kXiOpWz/8e58292d2730beee830254f55c2e695f/20240905-is-investment-grade-still-worth-considering-stock-bond-correlation-fig1-800px.jpg?fit=pad&w=800&h=650&f=center&fm=webp)
Source: Robeco, Bloomberg, as of 31 July 2024. Data 1973 onward monthly. Correlations have been calculated for the US stock and bond market. Core PCE: US Personal Consumption Expenditure Core Price Index.
Why not just Treasuries?
If yields are now more attractive and high-quality fixed income is expected to be a better diversifier going forward, why not invest in government bonds like US Treasuries rather than investment grade credit, given that government bonds already offer an attractive yield? The answer lies in the long-term performance of investment grade credit. It’s not so much about timing the market as it is about time in the market. Over the long term, investment grade credit has delivered higher total returns than government bonds. For example, global investment grade credit has delivered an annual total return of 3.6% over the last 24 years (2000-2023)1, compared to an average of 2.9% for global government bonds.2 Over the last five years, global investment grade credit has outperformed global government bonds by an average 1% per year.
Our base case anticipates moderating global growth without a recession, ongoing disinflation, and a pivot by central banks to a less restrictive policy stance. This creates a supportive backdrop for high-quality fixed income in general, and investment grade credit in particular. In this scenario, investors can enjoy both an attractive yield and yield pick-up over government bonds, and perhaps also benefit from further compression of credit spreads. If we are wrong and encounter much weaker growth or a recession, leading to some credit spread widening, a likely more aggressive response from central banks would lead to a rally in government bonds, protecting total returns on investment grade credits.
Standing out in today’s market
Technicals are also favorable, as the demand for credit remains strong with investors looking to lock in higher yields. Barring a major shock, there is little reason to think credit spreads should widen meaningfully from here. Corporate fundamentals for investment grade companies are very solid. The recent hiking cycle by central banks has not inflicted pain like previous cycles, as investment grade corporates were proactive in managing their debt levels and issuing debt at low yields during the low-rate environment of the Covid pandemic. Therefore, interest rate costs for investment grade companies are manageable.
Lastly, we expect increased dispersion in credit markets, which is good news for active and skilled credit managers. By focusing on high-quality credit selection, managers can identify resilient issuers, avoid potential pitfalls, and capture attractive risk-adjusted returns, ensuring that investment grade credit remains a compelling option even in uncertain times.
Footnotes
1 As measured by the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate Total Return Index (EUR hedged)
2 As measured by the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Government Bond Total Return Index (EUR hedged)
免責聲明
本文由荷宝海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。 本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。 本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况,荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。