The EU is introducing the second level of its SFDR regulations which apply to all asset managers selling investment products within the 27-nation bloc from January. A notable update compared to the currently operating Level I regime is being made to Robeco’s operational definitions of what constitutes a sustainable investment.
The SFDR is not a labelling regime – rather it formalizes the principle that financial products which promote sustainable characteristics, or claim to have sustainable investment objectives, must comply with enhanced transparency rules.
While this will not affect the underlying sustainable integration that Robeco has practiced for decades, there will be a number of strategy reclassifications as a result of applying the new rules.
There are currently three classifications of strategies: Article 6, which do not promote sustainability; Article 8, where environmental or social characteristics are promoted; and Article 9, where sustainable investment is a specific and provable objective. This will remain in place under Level II.
Revising the definitions
What has changed is that it became clear that Article 9 products should only contain investments that can be defined as sustainable within the meaning of the SFDR.1 The regulatory definition of sustainable investment within the SFDR is:
The strategy and its underlying assets should contribute to an environmental or social objective
They must not do significant harm to any other environmental or social objective
The investee companies must follow good governance practices.
Applying Robeco’s updated operational definitions of what constitutes a sustainable investment means strategies that wish to be classified as Article 9 need to be investing solely in sustainable investments, which Robeco deems to be one of three things.
Firstly, we can include companies that get positive scores of +1, +2 or +3 under Robeco’s proprietary SDG Framework.2 This assesses the contributions that companies can make to one or more of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, on a scale from -3 (highly negative) through zero (neutral) to +3 (highly positive). A positive SDG score indicates that the company contributes positively to one or more SDGs without causing harm.
Secondly, if a strategy has a specific carbon reduction objective and uses a Paris-Aligned Benchmark or a Climate Transition Benchmark, the constituents of those benchmarks are also considered to be sustainable investments. Finally, investments in green, social, and sustainability bonds will be eligible as sustainable investments as well.
Positive SDG scores
Applying the first, default definition means seven RobecoSAM-branded strategies will be reclassified as Article 8, since the nature of their investment universes means they are allowed to include companies with either neutral or negative SDG scores. Indeed, RobecoSAM Global SDG Engagement Strategies intentionally targets companies with SDG scores of -1, since they offer the best opportunities for betterment through engagement.
The other strategies that will become Article 8 are RobecoSAM SDG Credit Income Strategy; RobecoSAM SDG High Yield Bonds Strategy; RobecoSAM Euro SDG Credits Strategy; RobecoSAM Global SDG Credits Strategy; and RobecoSAM Global Gender Equality Strategies. Their investment universes span companies with positive to neutral SDG scores.
These strategies still promote environmental and social factors, and the percentage of certifiable sustainable investments in the underlying assets remains high. This means that while they do not meet the 100% sustainability requirement to be eligible for Article 9, they still remain a high exposure towards those companies that are contributing to sustainable development.3
Climate-related benchmarks
Applying the second criteria affects the ‘Smart’ range of three RobecoSAM-branded strategies. Since these strategies have a carbon reduction objective, they must have a climate-related benchmark in order to retain their Article 9 classification.
It was therefore decided that RobecoSAM Smart Energy Strategies, RobecoSAM Smart Mobility Strategies, and RobecoSAM Smart Materials Strategies will follow a Climate Transition Benchmark. This additional benchmark will be used for steering, measuring and monitoring the carbon objective of the strategies; for outright performance, the stategy will continue to follow the MSCI World Index.
Further guidance on the eligibility of government bonds to be deemed as sustainable investment instigated the re-classification of the RobecoSAM Climate Global Bonds strategy as Article 8. Non-ESG labeled government and government-related bonds are not eligible as sustainable investments.
It’s an ongoing process
The SFDR and its levels of implementation affect all asset managers selling products within the EU. “We are starting to see that managers are reviewing their approach to SFDR and subsequently classifications – a natural step towards finding a common ground on the interpretation of the regulation in the market,” says Malene Christensen, sustainable investment specialist at Robeco.
“According to a Morningstar Q2 review of Articles 8 and 9, 16 strategies outside Robeco were reclassified in the second quarter of 2022. So we are already starting to see some reclassification in the market, speaking to the fact that managers are becoming more cautious in their approach.”
“With Robeco meeting the Level II requirements ahead of the regulatory deadline, we expect to see more reclassifications in the market as Level II enters into force, and as the market finds more common ground.”
Stopping greenwashing
Christensen says it is important not to view SFDR as a product labeling game. The regulation is set out to increase transparency and enable the end-user to clearly understand and compare the underlying sustainability characteristics of any investment strategy. This forms part of a wider challenge in preventing greenwashing – where a strategy (or product) claims to be sustainable when in fact it isn’t.
“The greater the number of sustainability claims that a manager makes related to an investment product, the more that product is subject to disclosures and scrutiny on the binding sustainability elements in the investment strategy, such as the percentage of investments in Taxonomy-aligned activities, and so forth,” she says.
“To this end, we hope and expect that the current focus on classifications will be replaced with a focus on the underlying elements, such as the percentages of sustainable investments in the fund, its Taxonomy alignment, and the Principal Adverse Impact Indicators that are applicable.”
1 With the exception of non-sustainable investments for hedging or liquidity purposes.
2 Exception for the thematic strategies. These are allowed to have 10% of their investments in companies with a neutral SDG score if it can be shown that the company is engaged in innovative, sustainable activities that are not yet captured by Robeco’s SDG Framework.
3 Article 9 strategies are still allowed to hold non-sustainable investments for hedging and liquidity purposes.
免責聲明
本文由荷宝海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。 本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。 本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况,荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。