Almost half of investors are progressing their net-zero efforts in some way, rising to a total of 48% from 45% in the 2022 survey. The number of investors who have already committed to making their assets under management carbon neutral by 2050 fell slightly to 25% from 27%, while those who are in the process of committing to doing so rose to 23% from 18%.
The biggest chunk is the ‘don’t knows’, since 35% of investors are investigating what making a net-zero commitment would mean for their portfolios, and whether it is feasible for them to do so. The results were obtained from the third annual survey of 300 investors across the investment spectrum, from asset managers and owners to pension funds, insurers and banks.
Meeting the Paris Agreement
The need for net zero stems from the Paris Agreement, which seeks to limit the increase in global temperatures to well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels by the end of this century. In order to achieve this, the world needs to become carbon neutral by 2050, principally by cutting emissions.
The Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative was signed in 2020 by global investors including Robeco who have taken the Net Zero Carbon Pledge to decarbonize all assets under management by the mid-century deadline. So far, Europe is in the lead with the pledge, with 37% of investors making a net-zero commitment, compared with 20% in the Asia Pacific region and 19% in North America.
Among investors, insurers are taking the lead, with 39% having a commitment in place, not least as the insurance sector is among the most vulnerable to climate change. This compares to 28% of institutional investors and 19% of wholesale firms.
Has your organization made a public commitment to achieving net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from its investment portfolio by 2050, or is it in the process of doing so?
![Has your organization made a public commitment to achieving net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from its investment portfolio by 2050, or is it in the process of doing so?](https://images.ctfassets.net/tl4x668xzide/33kqLefPg877Zzwb4A9oJS/a914c5363bb9d7eb20c2bbab841c84bf/global-climate-survey-investors-remain-committed-to-net-zero-fig1.jpg?fit=pad&w=1000&h=353&f=center&fm=webp)
The challenge of Scope 3
Emissions reductions remain key to decarbonization across three scopes. Scope 1 are generated by the company and Scope 2 from the energy used to make the product. Scope 3 are the most difficult to quantify since they occur across the entire value chain for the lifetime of the product. In the case of a motor car, for example, these could be generated for decades.
The survey showed that 55% of investors have developed a high-level understanding of the largest material impacts of portfolios on emissions, while 42% have actually calculated the carbon footprint using Scope 1 and 2 data. However, only 20% are measuring Scope 3. This may improve as the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) has announced plans to make Scope 3 disclosures mandatory later in 2023.
What is also key is the level of transitioning – companies that currently have high emissions but are making a real effort to decarbonize. Only 27% said they have obtained a forward-looking view of what emissions pathway investee companies are on, which is key for understanding which firms are credible ‘transitioners’. The laggards can often be identified for engagement.
Cutting emissions
While the enthusiasm for net zero is rising, actually implementing it is proving more troublesome, partly due to the difficulties in calculating emissions. Net zero requires decarbonization at the portfolio level of about 7% a year between now and 2050, which in turn means setting targets for investee companies, and not just relying on ‘quick fix’ divestment.
Some 53% of investors said they have set carbon-reduction targets at the asset class level, such as in an equities product. However, only 29% of those making net-zero commitments have put interim targets in place, such as over a five-year term, and only 13% have set targets at the issuer level focusing on the companies themselves.
What does your approach to net zero portfolio targets currently include? Or, if it is still being finalized, what will it include within the next 12 months?
![What does your approach to net zero portfolio targets currently include? Or, if it is still being finalized, what will it include within the next 12 months?](https://images.ctfassets.net/tl4x668xzide/7yn7m25mLIvcH0XeVZUywZ/1c533e10dc499aedfa2b3e66db0da635/global-climate-survey-investors-remain-committed-to-net-zero-fig2.jpg?fit=pad&w=1000&h=372&f=center&fm=webp)
Seeking climate solutions
Pursuing net zero has implications for portfolio construction, led by increased demand for low-carbon investment strategies. Some 25% of investors said they are very likely to increase allocations to investment products specifically targeting climate solutions, while 11% have already done so. Similar numbers said they would increase allocations to strategies with a low-carbon approach.
In both cases, European investors are leading the way; 40% for climate solutions and 49% for low-carbon approaches, ahead of APAC and North American investors. This means large amounts of capital could be competing for limited opportunities until the climate fund pool gets bigger. Some 29% said they will move to climate-related benchmarks, which could have major implications for index-tracking mandates.
What is the likelihood that your organization will take the following measures over the next 12 months in order to decarbonize its investment portfolio?
![What is the likelihood that your organization will take the following measures over the next 12 months in order to decarbonize its investment portfolio?](https://images.ctfassets.net/tl4x668xzide/240R49QMJGsxwRmb9oYk4g/8e818d7db5e544103c9adf7772b028af/global-climate-survey-investors-remain-committed-to-net-zero-fig3.jpg?fit=pad&w=1000&h=313&f=center&fm=webp)
Wider climate change
The findings are consistent with the principal question in the survey: the number of investors for whom climate change is a significant part of, or central to, their investment policy. This has remained stable at 71%, slightly down from the 75% seen in 2022, following a barrage of headwinds. The figure is, though, projected to rise to 85% over the next two years.
Sentiment was hurt by greater geopolitical uncertainty following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. This added to inflationary pressures and triggered an energy price spike, particularly in Europe, leading some investors to pause or revise plans to move away from fossil fuels in the short term.
Read the full survey report here
時刻把握我們最新市場觀點及電子報
接收荷寶電子報,率先閱讀最新洞察分析,並構建最綠色的投資組合。
免責聲明
本文由荷宝海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。 本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。 本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况,荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。