09-06-2023 · 月度展望

Catching a brea(d)th

Investors should tread warily as a tech-obsessed stock market is out of sync with economic reality, says strategist Peter van der Welle.

    作者

  • Peter van der Welle - Strategist Sustainable Multi Asset Solutions

    Peter van der Welle

    Strategist Sustainable Multi Asset Solutions

Equities are trading in a narrow range not seen since the 2000 tech bubble and the 2020 Covid crisis as the mega-tech stocks account for virtually all market returns. The artificial intelligence (AI) theme has particularly captured the imagination, sending ‘big tech’ share prices soaring.

Yet, economic indicators continue to signal that the world is in a late business cycle that is likely to bring a recession in 2024. This kind of bifurcation can trip up investors.

“After a dismal 2022, where aggressive rate hikes and rising discount rates set the tone for cross-asset performance, investors have been eagerly on the lookout for a cashflow-positive narrative,” says Van der Welle, strategist with Robeco Sustainable Multi-Asset Solutions.

Evolutionary jump

“They have been served well, as the evolutionary jump in large-language models like ChatGPT took center stage. In 2022 the relative performance of technology stocks versus the broader index was closely knit with the change in US real yields.”

“But in the year to date, the story is completely different, as the relative technology stock performance has clearly defied the gravitational pull of higher real interest rates. Moreover, the big US tech stocks have even outperformed the S&P 500 ex-tech by a whopping 50%. If it were not for big tech, the S&P 500 would be up a meagre 1% over the same time.”

This bifurcation between the big tech stocks of Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Meta (Facebook) and Google versus the rest of the S&P 500 can be seen in the chart below. “This narrow breadth in stock markets is intriguing,” Van der Welle says.

catching-a-breadth-1.jpg

Perspective matters

“It may very well be true – as the latest performance in big tech suggests – that AI gets wings and triggers profound change across economic sectors. If a positive supply shock emerges from rapid AI technology diffusion, boosting productivity as well as benign disinflation, non-tech related S&P 500 performance could soon follow suit.”

“Yet, perspective matters in investing, and it is easy to conflate the secular with the cyclical outlook. It was American economist Robert Solow who famously remarked that he saw computers everywhere except in the productivity statistics. The pace of technology diffusion may have increased as we have entered an age of digitization, but still could underwhelm.”

“Though the strong AI-driven positive stock market momentum may continue for longer, the cyclical backdrop is darkening in our base case view, hinting that we are in a late phase of the business cycle which ultimately transitions into a recession in 2024.”

Seeing what you want to see

Van der Welle says the strong momentum of the AI theme resembles the white birds in M.C. Escher’s famous 1938 ‘Two birds’ lithograph, shown below. The white birds quickly catch the eye (and imagination), but upon closer inspection an identical bird with notably darker plumage symmetrically appears from the background, flying in the opposite direction.

catching-a-breadth-2.jpg

And there are other remarkable bifurcations in the macro economy and markets next to the narrow breadth in the S&P 500’s YTD performance, Van der Welle says.

“Take for instance the divergence between consumer/producer survey data about where the economy is heading, and the so-called hard data (GDP, retail sales),” he says. “The former has been downbeat since Q4 last year, with the well-known ISM manufacturing indicator consistently hinting at a manufacturing recession for seven months in a row now.”

“While the ISM manufacturing usually does a decent job in capturing the swings in economic activity, broader economic activity in the US has failed to budge, with US GDP expanding over the past two quarters. A similar streak emerges from European macro data, even as the Eurozone has much more narrowly avoided a recession in the year to date.”

Post-Covid spending binge

Much of this was artificially created by the USD 2.5 trillion in Covid recovery funds that generated a spending binge in the US that is unsustainable, Van der Welle warns.

“In our view, habit formation on the side of the US consumer leading to an (over-)extended spending frenzy in the wake of huge post-pandemic fiscal support packages seems to be the main culprit here,” he says.

“The relationship between leading business cycle indicators and the real economy has not broken down, but the lags may be longer than usual, due to unexpected resilience from the consumer who has kept spending even as real income growth declined last year.”

“Yet, this strength is eroding as credit card data show the US consumer is stretched. Walmart’s CEO noted earlier this year that consumers have become more ‘thoughtful and discerning’. Retail sales data from Q1 2023 reveals that the US consumer has already begun to trade down, buying cheaper, less fancy stuff.”

“An increase in household price elasticity of demand flags trouble for corporate pricing power and earnings. However, there are safe havens. While overall retail spending volumes have flattened, spending patterns do show a wedge between income cohorts, as global demand for (ultra-)luxury goods is still strong.”

時刻把握我們最新市場觀點及電子報​

接收荷寶電子報,率先閱讀最新洞察分析,並構建最綠色的投資組合。

掌握新形勢

Commodities versus equities

Another bifurcation can be seen across asset classes. “Commodities and equities seemingly tell a different story about what’s going on in the global economy,” Van der Welle says. “While both risky assets are susceptible for business cycle turning points and are normally positively correlated, commodities are in a bear market, down 10% in the year to date, while the MSCI AC World is up by 7.9% over the same time.”

“Another recessionary signal from commodities comes from the copper/gold ratio (a cyclical growth proxy) which has trended downwards in the year to date, and now is clearly out of whack with real long-term bond yields and equity performance.”

“In addition, we observe a historically stretched MOVE/VIX ratio, with equity options traders appearing unusually more sanguine about their asset class than their fixed income counterparts, signaling yet another bifurcation.”

免責聲明

本文由荷宝海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。 本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。 本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况,荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。