Yet, there are still headwinds to achieving the unified response necessary, as Robeco’s fourth annual Global Climate Investing Survey discovered. The 2024 edition highlighted three areas in which enthusiasm has slumped or even gone backward: the anti-ESG sentiment in North America; continued support for fossil fuels; and a lack of commitment to biodiversity preservation.
In North America, the number of respondents who said climate change was a significant or central part of their policy slumped from 61% in 2023 to just 35% this year. This was cited as being mainly due to a backlash against sustainable investing generally – in the belief that it hurts returns – that has grown in intensity in the past two years.
![eye-of-the-hurricane-1.jpg](https://images.ctfassets.net/tl4x668xzide/4hN81TJaog0NgWzWOB1PvP/6a37e320330e5beaadf0f4f291e6036f/eye-of-the-hurricane-1.jpg?fit=pad&w=800&h=597&f=center&fm=webp)
Source (for all charts): Robeco Global Climate Investing Survey 2024
In a stark reading of regional differences, this compared with 79% of Asia-Pacific investors and 76% of those in Europe. It brought the global average down from 71% to 62% last year. This was also seen in commitments to net zero, where North American interest fell from an already low 19% to 13%, while Europe remained steady at 37% and APAC’s interest rose from 20% to 26%.
Ironically, North America has suffered greatly from the more extreme weather that global warming is bringing, from deadly hurricanes and floods, to tornados turning up in areas previously free from them. Rising sea levels would submerge low-lying regions such as Florida.
A polarized culture war
“It’s become a politicized and polarized culture war between the Republicans and Democrats in the US, which has become disconnected from the facts and reality,” says Lucian Peppelenbos, Climate and Biodiversity Strategist at Robeco.
“The reality is that climate change has been impacting the US economy big time for years, and the costs of it are increasing. They are getting massive bills from natural catastrophes and if assets such as homes and businesses can no longer be insured, that will have a huge impact on the wider economy.”
“But the good news is the transition is also happening. The US has been decarbonizing since 2007, and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) has been a complete success in boosting green investments. That, frankly, is the most important piece of climate legislation in the history of the US.”
“And let’s remember that there’s a valid point that lay at the cradle of the anti-ESG movement, before it got politicised. This is the question that if the public sector doesn’t legislate to combat climate change, how far can the market go to do it instead? But all of these things come in waves, and so the ESG tide will turn again.”
The fossil fuel elephant
The second headwind is often described as the ‘elephant in the room’ for climate investing – whether to hold fossil fuel companies in portfolios. The number of investors pledging to completely divest from oil and gas companies in the short term dropped from 23% to 14% last year. Some 15% said they would continue to invest as long as they continued to generate returns.
The returns issue lies at the heart of the problem, since energy companies have been among the best performers on stock markets since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. While sustainable asset managers will seek to reduce emissions, they also have a fiduciary duty to make money for their stakeholders. Excluding fossil fuel companies would therefore cause underperformance.
“Oil and gas is a tricky issue, but the situation is that total energy demand is still growing quicker than what renewables can fill up,’ Peppelenbos says. ‘’Around two-thirds of the increased energy demand in 2023 was met by fossil fuels. While renewable energy has grown massively, its share is still only around 20% of total energy demand.”
![eye-of-the-hurricane-2.jpg](https://images.ctfassets.net/tl4x668xzide/4ULhfNwnCFytKO6iB0qFyX/e801053e2898ac185bbd9e9c1d8ca8fc/eye-of-the-hurricane-2.jpg?fit=pad&w=800&h=714&f=center&fm=webp)
Reaching a tipping point
“Fossil fuel demand will start to go down when there are more EVs on the road, for example, while renewable capacity will continue to be ramped up. Then we will reach a tipping point and investments in new oil and gas projects will dry up.”
“Don’t forget that we’re in the middle of a massive historical transformation in which reaching this tipping point will be beset with ups and downs. We’re moving from fossil fuels to net zero with this messy period in-between.”
“And of course, renewables have also had their own headwinds in terms of things like rising interest rates, which is difficult for a capital-intensive growth industry. Inflation means costs are going up in the supply chain, and we also need massive capacity enhancement to the grid. But the picture will look very different in a few years’ time.”
A back seat for biodiversity
The third headwind is declining interest in protecting biodiversity, which many believe to be the other side of the coin of tackling global warming, since nature is inexorably linked to climate change.
Deforestation exacerbates global warming, while almost half of global GDP is linked to nature in some way.
The number of investors for whom biodiversity is a significant or central part of investment policy dropped from 48% in 2023 to 36%, while those who said it formed no part of their policy at all rose from 15% last year to 23%, the Climate Survey showed.
![eye-of-the-hurricane-3.jpg](https://images.ctfassets.net/tl4x668xzide/13vZT9yDusAwFMiu3V1ERX/ce4fccb75c74c6a6a727003fafc3426d/eye-of-the-hurricane-3.jpg?fit=pad&w=800&h=556&f=center&fm=webp)
Meeting Montreal
“We had a lot of momentum in 2022 with COP15 in Montreal, when governments agreed to halt and reverse nature loss by 2030; this was a pivotal moment,” Peppelenbos says. “But governments have not lived up to it, even in Europe, which has been struggling to legislate it. The lofty commitments from Montreal need to find their way into real legislation for nature to become more material, and for the markets to price in nature risks more seriously.”
“We do see attractive alpha opportunities in companies that are providing solutions such as wastewater treatment, and in polluting companies that are seriously transitioning. Resource efficiency, sustainable sourcing and closed-loop cycles go very well hand in hand with profitability and return.”
“However, to really shift the market and reach the scale of investments that are required, we need more serious policy action. The recent elections in Europe were more favorable than we had thought in terms of support for the green economy, but it’s still a bit on the back burner.”
More insights from the Global Climate Survey 2024
免責聲明
本文由荷宝海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。 本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。 本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况,荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。