In the (brief) risk-off periods in 2023 and 2024, bonds have rallied when stocks and other risky assets declined. Therefore the strategy can play a valuable role in portfolios with its strong performance in challenging market environments.
We continuously strive to enhance the market-timing strategy. The latest innovation is the addition of duration positions that aim to exploit shorter-term market inefficiencies. These positions should act as a diversifying source of alpha within the existing risk budget while staying true to the nature of the strategy: all active positions are taken in developed government bond markets, based on quantitative strategies.
The strategy
The flagship of our dynamic duration offering is a global bond strategy, driven primarily by bond market timing through dynamic duration management. The strategy’s duration (interest-rate sensitivity) is increased when our quantitative model has a positive outlook on bond markets, and reduced when the model is negative. The strategy aims to offer protection against rising bond yields and to benefit strongly from declining yields. These active duration positions are implemented using futures in the main developed bond markets: US, Germany and Japan. The global government bond portfolio – on top of which the dynamic duration overlay is applied – is managed with an enhanced index approach, taking sustainability considerations into account. This portfolio is tilted toward government bonds that are deemed attractive based on factors like value, momentum and low-risk. Meanwhile, our portfolio construction algorithm also ensures that, compared to the index, the portfolio’s average ESG rating is better and the average carbon intensity is lower.
Bonds are back – and so is bond-market volatility
Government bond yields declined in the decade after the financial crisis and reached their lowest levels in 2020 during Covid, with negative yields even on long-dated German bonds. From these levels, further declines in yields and hence further gains for bonds were harder to achieve. But global bond yields have recovered: the yield of the JP Morgan Global Government Bond index is now 1% higher than the average since 1998.
As yields have recovered, bonds have regained the ability to rally strongly when yields decline in response to bad news. This was clear during the US regional banks crisis in spring 2023 and again in summer 2024, when the Nikkei index plunged 12% in a day, and weak US labor market data raised fears of a hard landing. Obviously, yields can also rise further. For example, after the strong rise in yields in 2021-2023, government bonds again lost nearly 3% in the first four months of 2024. And in October, US yields rose ca. 50 bps in a single month. So yes, bonds are back; with yields at better levels, bonds again offer diversification in risk-off periods. But keep in mind, bond volatility is back as well.
Figure 1 - Yield of the global government bond index (unhedged) and average level over 1998-2024
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e9f0/0e9f0fc92e8854274e827725c1d5bfd9f5811cae" alt="Figure 1 - Yield of the global government bond index (unhedged) and average level over 1998-2024"
Source: JP Morgan. January 2025
Strong performance when markets move most
The return of bond volatility is actually good news for the Dynamic Duration strategy, as the best opportunities to add value through bond market timing arise when bond yields move significantly. While the live track record of the strategy’s quantitative duration management is already 27 years long, until recently, yields had mainly declined during this period. As we employ a quantitative strategy, we can use backtests and deep historical datasets to look back and analyze what the performance of such a strategy would have been in periods with predominantly rising yields, like the 1970s and early 1980s. That is precisely what we did in our paper published in The Financial Analyst Journal. We showed that the bond market timing strategy is both more profitable and more accurate (a higher success ratio) in calendar quarters with large changes in yields – both upward and downward.
信貸投資的新動態
訂閱我們的電子報,緊跟最新的信貸投資趨勢。
Confirmed in the live track record
Throughout its live track record, Robeco QI Global Dynamic Duration has performed in line with the pattern described above: it has, on average, delivered outperformance in the quarters with the weakest bond returns and in the quarters with the weakest equity returns, when bond returns tend to be strong. The average outperformance was in both scenarios clearly stronger than the average outperformance over the full track record. In Figure 2 we show the strategy performance in periods with strongly rising yields and in periods with large equity market declines. The right-hand panel shows the performance in the calendar quarters where the JP Morgan Global Government Bond Index declined more than 1% (now 18 quarters of the 108 quarters since the inception in 19981 ). Government bonds lost an average of 2.5% in these quarters. Robeco QI Global Dynamic Duration outperformed by 0.6% on average (not annualized!) in these quarters.
On the left-hand side of Figure 2, we focus on the calendar quarters where the MSCI World index declined more than 5%. This happened in 17 out of 108 calendar quarters since 1998. As the graph shows, government bonds on average gained 2.5% in these periods. Robeco QI Global Dynamic Duration’s average outperformance in these quarters was 1.1% (again not annualized).
Figure 2 - Impressive outperformance in the worst quarters for stocks and bonds since inception of the model
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04895/04895edb9c4a979a08a91405df2070fc4dde2ebd" alt="Figure 2 - Impressive outperformance in the worst quarters for stocks and bonds since inception of the model"
Source: Robeco, Bloomberg. Robeco QI Global Dynamic Duration DH EUR share class. Measurement period 1998-2024. Outperformance refers to average outperformance per quarter over the measurement period and is not annualized. Worst quarters for equities defined as all calendar quarters in the measurement period with a total return for the MSCI World Index of -5% or below (in EUR). Worst quarters for bonds defined as all calendar quarters in the measurement period with a EUR-hedged total return for the JP Morgan Global Government Bond Index of -1% or below. Performance figures gross of fees, based on gross asset value. All figures in EUR. In reality costs (such as management fees and other costs) are charged. These have a negative effect on the returns shown. The value of your investments may fluctuate. Results obtained in the past are no guarantee for the future.
New quant duration signals to exploit market inefficiencies
Although our duration-timing research started more than 30 years ago, we keep striving for further enhancements. Our recent research has focused on inefficiencies that result in predictable shorter-term patterns in government bond markets. For example, we observe a V-shaped price pattern around government bond auctions: prices tend to decline in the run-up to the auction and to recover afterward. Figure 3 shows an example of bond futures prices around a US Treasury bond auction, where the vertical line denotes the time of the release of the auction results. As illustrated, the futures price declined before the auction, and recovered immediately after.
We can benefit from this pattern with a short position in government bond futures ahead of the auction, which is then closed and replaced by a long position beforehand. Markets generally absorb the new bond supply quickly, allowing prices to recover and the overweight to be again closed. We thus buy bonds when the Treasury is supplying new bonds to the market, benefiting from the temporarily lower prices. Our research shows how and when to exactly position to efficiently harvest the premium for this liquidity provision, taking risk considerations and transaction costs into account.
Figure 3 - Intraday futures prices (US 10-year bond future) around the December 2023 US 10-year bond auction
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20ea6/20ea6c4800f847d0bb8f2fe62745cebfd67ef013" alt="Figure 3 - Intraday futures prices (US 10-year bond future) around the December 2023 US 10-year bond auction"
Source: Robeco, TickData LLC. Note: Date and time on the horizontal axis have been converted to CET
This auction strategy requires multiple trades within a matter of days. Compared to our regular duration positions, which tend to last for a few weeks to a few months, this is clearly a more short-term strategy. This results in a low correlation with the performance of these regular positions, providing diversification benefits within the strategy. We expect to generate some additional return without materially increasing absolute or relative risk.
The auction strategy is the first shorter-term signal that we have implemented in the dynamic duration strategy. We aim to add more signals in the future, capturing other market inefficiencies. When we do, we will not allow the combined shorter-term signals to take active positions larger than one year of duration. We will not increase the strategy’s tracking error limit; the new signals will be added within the existing risk budget.
Conclusion
Bonds are back: with better yields, they offer diversification in risk-off periods, and bond volatility creates opportunities for Robeco QI Global Dynamic Duration to add value through market timing. The strategy now includes new duration signals to capture short-term inefficiencies, adding a diversifying alpha source while focusing on developed government bond markets. This innovation builds on 27 years of strong performance. Both our academic research and live track record show that the strategy delivers the most value in challenging market environments, such as the recent multi-year period of sharply rising yields.
Footnote
1January 1998 marks the start of the track record generated based on the current investment strategy in which the active duration positions are based on the quantitative model.
免責聲明
本文由荷宝海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。 本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。 本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况,荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。