This is a risky gamble which potentially gives Le Pen’s right-wing party a route to government. To date, the subsequent volatility has been felt most acutely in French bank and sovereign bonds. The market’s key concern appears to center not on ‘Frexit’ but rather the prospect of fiscal largesse, exacerbating already stretched sovereign credit metrics.
At the time of writing, we cannot know the ultimate outcome of the elections, however this episode serves as a timely reminder of the potential for meaningful volatility arising from unexpected events. Clearly, this is felt more acutely when valuations are high and consensus leans heavily in the same direction.
We target a more neutral positioning in investment grade and emerging markets, focusing on generating alpha through issuer selection. Within high yield we remain committed to our quality bias, resulting in a beta below the benchmark. (See the Outlook from the Global Macro team.)
Fundamentals
Economic data in the US has continued to paint a picture of a resilient economy. Indeed, most commentators have abandoned the view that the economy must ultimately break or fall off a cliff owing to the sharpest hiking cycle in recent years. A ‘Goldilocks’ scenario of softer growth, cooling inflation and the prospect of imminent rate cuts remains the broad market consensus. If realized, this should provide a solid fundamental tailwind to fixed income investing, both in rates and credit.
In Europe, the debate is more nuanced. Earlier this month, the first interest rate cut was duly delivered although European Central Bank President Lagarde stressed future moves would be data dependent. While growth expectations have improved throughout the year and consumer confidence has visibly increased, the recent political (and ongoing geopolitical) turmoil makes the future somewhat harder to predict.
“
Corporate fundamentals appear solid overall
Corporate fundamentals appear solid overall. Within investment grade, the aggressive terming out of debt maturities at very low yields post Covid has clearly insulated many borrowers from rising interest rates. Leverage in both the investment grade and high yield markets has ticked up a little from recent lows but hardly appears a major cause for concern. Likewise, interest cover ratios have declined but reside at healthy levels. In aggregate, margins and liquidity stay robust. Default rates within high yield have picked up in recent quarters but remain at relatively low levels. Maturity walls in high yield, at least for the remainder of this year and the next, appear manageable. While a higher cost of debt could prove painful for some, it may also provide a strong incentive to deleverage.
信貸投資的新動態
訂閱我們的電子報,緊跟最新的信貸投資趨勢。
Valuations
As credit investors, our primary metric for assessing value in the market is to look at spreads. By examining 20 years of history we can see that US investment grade spreads currently look very skinny. This is particularly true of industrials, which currently sit at around the 4th percentile of historical observations. The Euro market doesn’t appear quite so rich by comparison, with spreads at or around the 50th percentile over the same period. In both cases, financials would seemingly offer superior relative value against non-financials.
There is a similar picture in high yield. The US market appears expensive in comparison to the EUR market, although, at around the 23rd percentile, it is hard to see compelling value in the EUR market in isolation. The notable exception here is the CCC-rated bucket where the more distressed cohort resides. We often refer to much of this as ‘phantom yield/spread’ as it is unlikely to be realized.
Technicals
In the final quarter of 2023, credit appeared to cheer the prospect of significant policy rate cuts over the course of 2024 and beyond, alleviating contemporaneous fears of recession. Yet the defining feature of 2024 thus far has been the unwinding of these expectations, both in regard to the timing and magnitude of policy loosening.
“
So why does demand for credit continue to be so strong?
It may therefore seem somewhat counterintuitive that credit spreads have continued to tighten as the probability of ‘higher for longer’ interest rates has increased. So why does demand for credit continue to be so strong, at even tighter spreads levels and facing a glut of supply?
The answer, we believe, lies in the ‘all-in yield’, with spreads potentially of secondary importance for many investors.
As described in greater detail already, suffice it to say that credit spreads appear far from cheap at current levels. Yet, when viewed through the lens of ‘all-in yields’ a different picture emerges. Looking back over the past decade, yields across most global credit cohorts currently sit in the 80+% percentile of historical observations.
While we must seek to understand and respect the technicals at all times, experience also tells us that they can change very quickly. An unbalanced supply and demand picture can cause spreads to trade far richer, or cheaper, than fundamentals might otherwise imply, and this can persist for long periods of time.
下載刊物
免責聲明
本文由荷宝海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(“荷宝上海”)编制, 本文内容仅供参考, 并不构成荷宝上海对任何人的购买或出售任何产品的建议、专业意见、要约、招揽或邀请。本文不应被视为对购买或出售任何投资产品的推荐或采用任何投资策略的建议。本文中的任何内容不得被视为有关法律、税务或投资方面的咨询, 也不表示任何投资或策略适合您的个人情况, 或以其他方式构成对您个人的推荐。 本文中所包含的信息和/或分析系根据荷宝上海所认为的可信渠道而获得的信息准备而成。荷宝上海不就其准确性、正确性、实用性或完整性作出任何陈述, 也不对因使用本文中的信息和/或分析而造成的损失承担任何责任。荷宝上海或其他任何关联机构及其董事、高级管理人员、员工均不对任何人因其依据本文所含信息而造成的任何直接或间接的损失或损害或任何其他后果承担责任或义务。 本文包含一些有关于未来业务、目标、管理纪律或其他方面的前瞻性陈述与预测, 这些陈述含有假设、风险和不确定性, 且是建立在截止到本文编写之日已有的信息之上。基于此, 我们不能保证这些前瞻性情况都会发生, 实际情况可能会与本文中的陈述具有一定的差别。我们不能保证本文中的统计信息在任何特定条件下都是准确、适当和完整的, 亦不能保证这些统计信息以及据以得出这些信息的假设能够反映荷宝上海可能遇到的市场条件或未来表现。本文中的信息是基于当前的市场情况, 这很有可能因随后的市场事件或其他原因而发生变化, 本文内容可能因此未反映最新情况,荷宝上海不负责更新本文, 或对本文中不准确或遗漏之信息进行纠正。