Scope 3 emissions occur along the entire value chain, for example when a building is being used by a lessee. Under the GHG Protocol, Scope 3 emissions are broken down into 15 categories, ranging from upstream emissions including ‘purchased goods and services’, to downstream emissions including leased assets. Among the top 200 largest listed real estate companies, only 56% of them disclosed their Scope 3 emissions in corporate reports, and for those that did, the figures provided are not exhaustive. Scope 3 emissions account for 86% of the overall emissions for companies that have disclosure for all scopes, seven times higher than Scope 1 & 2 (Figure 1). Some geographical variances are notable, with Hong Kong companies reporting only 8% of their emissions coming from Scope 3. This is in reality attributed to data incompleteness rather than the actual emissions.
Figure 1 | Carbon emissions breakdown by scope
Source: Corporate reports, Robeco.
Why don’t real estate companies always measure or disclose Scope 3 emissions?
Scope 3 emissions are difficult and expensive to measure due to their indirect nature and the challenge of collecting meaningful data. Figure 2 aggregates carbon emissions for companies in our sample that disclose all Scope 1 & 2, and Scope 3 emissions by category. It illustrates that carbon emissions of real estate companies are dominated by Scope 3 emissions.
Bleiben Sie über die neuesten Einblicke ins Sustainable Investing auf dem Laufenden
Melden Sie sich für unseren Newsletter an und erfahren Sie, welche Trends das Sustainable Investing prägen.
Figure 2 | Carbon emissions breakdown
Source: Corporate reports, Robeco.
Examining each Scope 3 category, Figure 3 shows that downstream categories such as ‘use of sold products’ and ‘downstream leased assets’ are among the most relevant for real estate companies, each accounting for about a quarter of the aggregated Scope 3 emissions respectively. The upstream category of ‘purchased goods and services’ accounts for another quarter.
Figure 3 | Scope 3 emissions breakdown by category
Source: Corporate reports, Robeco.1
Why do some companies disclose Scope 3 emissions?
The primary factor we can see is the regulatory framework the company operates under. This one key factor also explains the wide geographical variance in carbon reporting. Within our universe the leaders in Scope 3 emissions reporting include Great Britain (93%), Australia and New Zealand (75%), and the European Union (73%). On the other hand, the United States (41%) and Singapore (42%) exhibit low levels of disclosure. As demonstrated in Figure 4 below, mandatory carbon disclosure schemes vary across the eight geographies. Governments have a variety of potential policy interventions in their toolbox to support the sustainability transition, and mandatory reporting is an effective one.
Source: OECD, Robeco.
Full disclosure is necessary
Although disclosure is not a sufficient condition for decarbonization of the property sector, it is a necessary one. Credible net-zero pledges require complete and accurate accounting and reporting of all scope emissions and all operations along the value chain. Geographical variances show that the UK is leading in this regard with a mandatory carbon reporting scheme covering all scopes. This highlights the key role governments play in ensuring companies comprehensively assess their environmental impact, thereby paving the way towards a net-zero future.
Footnote
1 The data are sourced from companies in Robeco’s data that disclosed Scope 3 emissions by category.
